Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL + PRIMARY KEY = redundant indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL + PRIMARY KEY = redundant indexes
Дата
Msg-id 3738568D.A2CF348F@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на SERIAL + PRIMARY KEY = redundant indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
fwiw, there is this comment in the code:
* Note that this code does not currently look for all possible
redundant cases*  and either ignore or stop with warning. The create might fail
later when*  names for indices turn out to be duplicated, or a user might have
specified*  extra useless indices which might hurt performance. - thomas
1997-12-08

But I should (probably) be able to fix this particular case.
                       - Tom

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 604