Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 04:37:24PM -0700, Peter Garner wrote:
> > 2. Is there any work being done on the fact that
> > transactions are aborted when an error occurs? It
> > really lessens the usefulness of the product when,
> > after adding 20,000 records, the transaction aborts
> > because the 20,001th record is a dup key! :-)
>
> But this is exactly what a transaction is supposed to do. You should only
> make those commands inside one transaction that logically belong to each
> other or in other words, that you consider one action.
But _nested_ transactions would still be nice .
---------
Hannu