Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I haven't looked at the patch closely yet, but from a buildfarm POV I
> think the only thing that needs to be done is to inhibit the buildfarm
> client module if the TAP tests are present. The buildfarm code that runs
> TAP tests should automatically detect and run the new test.

> I've just counted and there are 116 animals reporting check-pg_upgrade,
> so we'd better put that out pronto. It's a little early but I'll try to
> push out a release containing code for it on Monday or Tuesday (it's a
> one line addition).

IIUC, the only problem for a non-updated animal would be that it'd
run the test twice?  Or would it actually fail?  If the latter,
we'd need to sit on the patch rather longer.

            regards, tom lane