> My presumption would be that if you initialize 2 databases to
> a known identical start, have all the same triggers and rules
> on both, then send all queries to both databases, you will
> have 2 identical databases at the end.
This is wrong assumption. If
1st client executes UPDATE t SET a = 1 WHERE b = 2;
2nd client executes UPDATE t SET a = 2 WHERE b = 2;
at "the same time" you don't know in what order these
queries will be executed on two different servers (because
you can't control what transaction will lock record(s)
for update first).
Vadim