Re: MVCC and index-only read
| От | Jonah H. Harris |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: MVCC and index-only read |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 36e682920811181158q6d712784t20d7465ac3601fac@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: MVCC and index-only read (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: MVCC and index-only read
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote: > If all the columns from the select list are available in the index, then > Oracle will always prefer the index scan over a table scan (at least I have > never seen something else). Even for a SELECT that returns all rows of the > table. No, it doesn't always prefer index fast full scan. > They are taking this concept even further with index organized tables, where > no real "table data" exists, everything is stored in the index (quited nice > for e.g. link tables that only consist of two or three integer columns) Those are essentially clustered indexes, and they're not quite stored exactly the same.. -- Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA myYearbook.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: