Re: count(*) optimization

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jonah H. Harris
Тема Re: count(*) optimization
Дата
Msg-id 36e6829205090612446b7dac6e@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на count(*) optimization  (huaxin zhang <uwcssa@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
huaxin... I'll save you the time... see the topic "MUCH ADO ABOUT COUNT(*)" and "ADVANCED INDEX USAGE".


On 9/6/05, huaxin zhang <uwcssa@gmail.com> wrote:
not sure where to put this.

I run two queries:

1. select count(*) from table where indexed_column<10;
2. select * from table where indexed_column<10;

the indexed column is not clustered at all. I saw from the trace that
both query runs
through index scans on that index and takes the same amount of buffer
hits and disk read. However, shouldn't the optimizer notice that the
first query only needs to look at the indexes
and possibly reduce the amount of buffer/disk visits?

thanks

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: huaxin zhang
Дата:
Сообщение: count(*) optimization
Следующее
От: Bruno Wolff III
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: count(*) optimization