Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions
| От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 36E55C73.32A97FD6@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions ("D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain <darcy@druid.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Niladic functions
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > This appears to be untrue. Is this a change since 6.4 or is there
> > > some cases where using CURRENT_TIMESTAMP will not do the expected
> > > thing?
> This paragraph says that CURRENT_TIMESTAMP is evaluated at the time
> the table is defined yet I tested this with a current version and it
> actually gets evaluated at INSERT time.
You are right; I had changed the parser to force a string into the parse
tree rather than a constant. Would you be interested in sending patches
for the docs? :)
> > > Also, the title of the document (The PostgreSQL Development Team)
> > > seems to be incorrect.
> > My browser shows that as the second line, just under the title
> > "PostgreSQL", as I intended. What browser are you using?
> Sorry, my misunderstanding. I didn't realize that PostgreSQL was the
> title of this particular document. Anyway, the link to this page is
> "Integrated Document" so there is a small inconsistency.
The problem is that this is a document integrated from all of the other
documents for purposes of HTML formatting and browsing. I wanted to make
clear that all of the information appears somewhere in the other
documents.
- Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: