Re: index "pg_authid_rolname_index" is not a btree
От | Andrus Moor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: index "pg_authid_rolname_index" is not a btree |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36E4271B929F4A3E95DB0835C224BE98@andrusnotebook обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: index "pg_authid_rolname_index" is not a btree (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: index "pg_authid_rolname_index" is not a btree
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom, Thank you. > Alvaro was right --- you've got damage in the system catalogs, not just > their indexes. This looks like missing entries in pg_amop. postgres -D data mydb PostgreSQL stand-alone backend 8.1.9 backend> select * from pg_amop 1: amopclaid (typeid = 26, len = 4, typmod = -1, byval = t) 2: amopsubtype (typeid = 26, len = 4, typmod = -1, byval = t) 3: amopstrategy (typeid = 21, len = 2, typmod = -1, byval = t) 4: amopreqcheck (typeid = 16, len = 1, typmod = -1, byval = t) 5: amopopr (typeid = 26, len = 4, typmod = -1, byval = t) ---- pg_amop in mydb contains 5 rows. pg_amop in template1 database contains large number of rows. mydb does not contain user-defined operators. How to repair pg_amop in mydb ? > (You did > say you reindexed all the system catalogs, right? If not it's possible > this is only index damage, but I'm not very hopeful.) reindex system mydb reindex database mydb complete without errors. > I suspect that if you did get to the point of being able to run pg_dump > without error, you'd find just as much damage to the user data. I'm > afraid this database is toast and you should write it off as a learning > experience. Hardware fails, you need backups. Backup is 4.2 GB and is corrupted after 2 GB as I described in other thread. Also, backup is too old. Most of backup size contains few big tables which are not required to recover. I ran truncate commands for those tables. This reduces whole data directory size to 1.2 GB in uncompressed form. I know which tables contain data to be recovered. How to dump those tables out ? Andrus.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: