> > I don't think lower is defined for varchar arguments.
> Note to hackers: is there a good reason why indexes are more
> restrictive? Offhand it seems like the same physical-equivalence
> trick could be applied.
Well, we should have a combination of "binary compatible" and type
coersion to make this fly, just as we have in other places for v6.4. I
didn't realize this index code was there, so never looked at it.
If someone else doesn't get to it, I'll try to look at it before or
during 6.5beta...
- Tom