temp tables versus the global sql area
| От | Terrence Brannon |
|---|---|
| Тема | temp tables versus the global sql area |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 36AF7A62-F280-11D5-92F7-003065C2A10C@mac.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: how does one replace a row in Postgresql? (ala MySQL REPLACE) (Philip Hallstrom <philip@adhesivemedia.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: temp tables versus the global sql area
|
| Список | pgsql-sql |
In the Momjian book it is stated: Temporary tables are ideal for holding intermediate data used by the current SQL session. For example, suppose you need to do many SELECTs on the result of a complex query. An efficient strategy is to execute the complex query once, then store the result in a temporary table. ...However, my question is doesn't postgresql calculate the cost of complex queries and store there result in some sort of global sql area sorted by LRU or cost so that you can simply write complex queries and take care of automatic caching?
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: