Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org> writes:
> Still checking on a good auto-detect.
ISTM that autoconf should be capable of figuring out which version of
kerberos libraries we have --- that sort of discrepancy is exactly
what it's designed to handle.
>> Kerberos APIs --- for example, the krb5_recvauth man pages I can find on
>> the net describe several more parameters than our code is expecting to
>> pass.
> For krb5_recvauth()? We are using the right function signature...
According to whom? I found
http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/General/CC/kerberos/krb5api/krb5api4.html
in which krb5_recvauth doesn't agree with our code. (I miscounted
yesterday, there's only one more parameter described than we pass,
but it's definitely not the same.)
regards, tom lane