Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3692.1180196259@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
| Ответы |
Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> A more interesting question is what sort of hardware you need for that
>> actually to be a win, though. Loading a few tables in parallel sounds
>> like an ideal recipe for oversaturating your disk bandwidth...
> you don't actually need that much of disk bandwidth both COPY and CREATE
> INDEX are CPU bottlenecked on modern boxes and reasonable disk
> subsystems - spreading their work over multiple cores/processes can give
> big benefits.
Hmm ... I wonder if that's true for COPY BINARY ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: