Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2022-08-04 19:01:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (This seems worth fixing before beta3, as it looks like a rather
>> nasty data corruption hazard.)

> Ugh, yes. And even with this fixed I think this should grow at least an
> assertion that the block numbers match, probably even an elog.

Yeah, the assumption that P_NEW would automatically match the source block
was making me itchy too.  An explicit test-and-elog seems worth the
cycles.

            regards, tom lane