Re: configure.in / xml / quoting trouble
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: configure.in / xml / quoting trouble |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3682.1183134944@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: configure.in / xml / quoting trouble (Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: configure.in / xml / quoting trouble
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 04:16:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What exactly does xml2-config --libs produce on your machine?
> -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -lxml2 -lz -lpthread -lm
> but because I added the -R - it isn't the default as distributed,
Hm. This doesn't seem like a bright way to be forcing an rpath.
The problem is that you have no idea what search order will result
when this is combined with any -R we ourselves might have included
or will later include into our LDFLAGS. As an example of possible
breakage, suppose you are trying to install PG into /opt/postgres
and there is already an old version of PG in /usr/local. You've
got about a fifty-fifty chance whether the produced binaries will
search /opt/postgres/lib before or after /usr/local/lib --- and
the second way is wrong, because they'd find the old version of
libpq.so.
Ugly as it sounds, I think you'd be better off setting the entire
Postgres rpath by hand by specifying LDFLAGS to configure.
The other thing that's a bit strange here is the reference to
libpthread --- does libxml2 really depend on that? I'd definitely
advise against linking libpthread into the backend if you can
avoid it.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: