Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Hmm. I'm inclined to just remove that sentence. The fact that you
> can make the operation fail by pointing it at someplace where there's
> not a server listening doesn't really seem to merit a disclaimer. I
> think waiting IS a well-defined operation now; it just won't succeed
> if you configure it in a way that doesn't make sense.
+1
regards, tom lane