Re: [HACKERS] sbufdesc' padding...

> * ... this hack cut 10% off of the time to create the Wisconsin
> * database! It eats up more shared memory, of course, but we're
> * (allegedly) going to make some of these types bigger soon 
> * anyway... -pma 1/2/93
> This is not true now:
> #define BufferDescriptorGetBuffer(bdesc) ((bdesc)->buf_id + 1)
> Comments ?...

Does that mean that we have re-introduced the slower allocation
technique sometime since 1993? 10% speed improvement for some operations
seems interesting...
                   - Tom