Re: BUG #19042: Option --help not recognized at the end of command line in pg_restore
От | Daniel Gustafsson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #19042: Option --help not recognized at the end of command line in pg_restore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 365ACB7B-B731-4F66-B69B-1765194A5B58@yesql.se обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #19042: Option --help not recognized at the end of command line in pg_restore (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #19042: Option --help not recognized at the end of command line in pg_restore
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
> On 3 Sep 2025, at 16:57, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Matthias =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B6rmann?= <matthias.hoermann@saltation.com> writes: >> The 2025-09-03 13:45:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>> This is the intended behaviour, --help (and --version) is parsed specially and >>> must be the first parameter. We do this for all command line utilities. > >> Well, the use-case that comes up quite often for me (for any commands, >> not just postgres) is that I add parameters I know or remember from my >> last look at --help and then want to check again what else to add, for >> that it is useful to be able to use --help as the last parameter. > > FWIW, I agree with this. Same here, it's a totally reasonable ask. > I'd be in favor of recognizing > --help (though probably not -?) in any argument position. Any particular reason to restrict -? from this? > Less sure about --version. Agreed, I think --version should require being the sole parameter. -- Daniel Gustafsson
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: