Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas G. Lockhart
Тема Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Дата
Msg-id 36517DEF.7989C4EC@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на PREPARE  ("Taral" <taral@cyberjunkie.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Список pgsql-hackers
> I'm still holding back PREPARE for ecpg until I can think of a
> good solution. The best of course would be in the backend.

So what would it take to do this in the backend? I think the places
which would need to be touched fall into areas I either know about or am
starting to look at to implement the CASE clause.

We'd need: - a "named buffer" (or several) to hold the intermediate input - a way to pass in parameters or substitution
arguments- a way to decide if previous parser/planner/executor   results can be reused
 

What else?
                       - Tom


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
Следующее
От: Terry Mackintosh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Tree type, how best to impliment?