Re: DOCS: Missing tags for some SEQUENCE fields
| От | Chao Li |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DOCS: Missing |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3648FEDF-185B-489C-B97C-6C665A5F578F@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на |
DOCS: Missing |
| Ответы |
Re: DOCS: Missing |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Nov 13, 2025, at 13:17, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > While reviewing the recent patches for SEQUENCE documentation I found > [1] a few more instances where the <structfield> tag should have been > used for some of the sequence fields (per the recent push [2]). > > PSA patch v1 to address these. > > ====== > [1] Searched all docs for 'is_called' and for 'last_value' > [2] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/980a855c5c2e21e964a739694e24004f72e03fdf > > Kind Regards, > Peter Smith. > Fujitsu Australia > <v1-0001-Fix-more-structfield-tags.patch> Good catch. LGTM. I rendered the html pages and viewed them, the pages also look good. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: