> While studying this I noticed a number of potential buffer overruns in
> the 7.2.3 version of describeTableDetails(). They were mostly fixed
> already in 7.3, and I just committed a fix for one more. However, I do
> not believe that any of these overruns could have occurred in the
> example you give, so there's still something fishy going on. On the
> whole, I'd still bet that it's a 64-bit-platform issue. But where? Good
> luck digging...
I compiled 7.3 and ran it on port 5454 while 7.2.3 was using 5432. On 7.3
the table was created and displayed normally without a segmentation fault.
Apparantly the bug fixes you committed between 7.2.3 and 7.3 fixed the
problem. Thank you.