Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi, this patch was marked in CF as "Needs Review" [1], but there has
> been no activity on this thread for 7+ months.
> If nothing more is planned for this thread then it will be closed
> ("Returned with feedback") at the end of this CF.
I still think it would be a good idea, but I can't deny the lack
of other interest in it. Unless someone steps up to review,
let's close it.
(FTR, I don't agree with David's objections to the entire concept
of zone abbreviations. We're not going to remove support for them
everywhere else, so why shouldn't to_timestamp() handle them?)
regards, tom lane