Re: [HACKERS] union regression test
| От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] union regression test |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 36058EE6.AFBE880B@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] union regression test (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] union regression test
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> If the float8 data type works better, we should make a float8 table
> that is uniform across platforms in order to test the union code.
> There is really no point in including the boundary cases of float8
> into a test of union.
> Perhaps a better solution is to insert into the union.sql code a
> float8 table creation, fill it with well-behaved data, and then use
> that table in the union test.
Yes, this is the best solution. Would you like to take a crack at it? I
can consolidate a patch and patch results on my machine (which has been
the nominal "truth" machine for the last few releases).
- Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: