Re: [HACKERS] union regression test

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas G. Lockhart
Тема Re: [HACKERS] union regression test
Дата
Msg-id 36058EE6.AFBE880B@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] union regression test  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] union regression test  (Brook Milligan <brook@trillium.NMSU.Edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> If the float8 data type works better, we should make a float8 table
> that is uniform across platforms in order to test the union code.
> There is really no point in including the boundary cases of float8
> into a test of union.
> Perhaps a better solution is to insert into the union.sql code a
> float8 table creation, fill it with well-behaved data, and then use
> that table in the union test.

Yes, this is the best solution. Would you like to take a crack at it? I
can consolidate a patch and patch results on my machine (which has been
the nominal "truth" machine for the last few releases).

                   - Tom

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Oleg Bartunov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] current- crash
Следующее
От: "Thomas G. Lockhart"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 715