Re: Truncate Triggers
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Truncate Triggers |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3602.1201287650@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Truncate Triggers (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Truncate Triggers
Re: Truncate Triggers |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 10:44 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There are way too many table privilege bits already; to add more you
>> need something a lot stronger than a "might be nice" argument.
> People use TRUNCATE whatever we say. If you force people to be table
> owners or superusers you merely restrict their security options.
By that argument you could justify a separate privilege bit for anything
at all, eg, each sub-variant of ALTER TABLE. Please present an actual
argument why TRUNCATE should get its own bit.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: