Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems...
| От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 35F61B38.FFC59D61@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems...
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Thanks so much. Now index problems have gone from my LinuxPPC box!
Whoo hoo! Thanks Vadim! Indices are much happier on my Linux box also :)
> Only remaining problem seems somewhat related to view. Still the
> select_views test and "select * from pg_user" produces core dumps.
Sadly, that is still true also. As I mentioned earlier, the actual
segfault happens when memory is free'd toward the end of a query. But of
course there is some problem earlier when the memory was allocated...
This is probably unrelated, but is it expected that the system views
have rule names prefixed with "_ret" whereas a view I create myself has
a name prefixed with "_RET"? Should initdb surround some of these names
in double quotes while it is doing its brute-force shadowing?
- Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: