Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas G. Lockhart
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers]
Дата
Msg-id 35EFFF1C.516F458F@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers]  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers]  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers]  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> I would be glad to help with integrating it.  We need a decision,
> people.  Who do we want to do this, and how are we going to handle
> integrating this into the beta, if we want to?
>
> BTW, does pg_upgrade work for people.  That may be a quick fix for the
> beta people to get these new system types WITHOUT dump/reload.

Better yet, they _should_ use pg_upgrade, so it gets some beta testing
too :)

I can help with making the types built-in, once there is code ready.
However, until we finish tracking down the indexing problems I'd like to
stay away from unrelated changes to the catalogs and backend code to
avoid confusing the issue.

Now that I think about it, that would have probably included the
snprintf changes, since now people trying to do debugging may not be
able to build with a new tree until that gets integrated...

                     - Tom

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Minor bugs and a formatting gripe
Следующее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers]