Gerald Gryschuk wrote:
> Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> > So, I just finished removing the stubs and internal calls which I had
> > added in (having now found the linker options which make sure things
> > resolve within the library), when I found some additional stubs which
> > are in results.c. They have been there since before I touched the code.
> > Are they required for Windows? If so, why aren't the other routines
> > required to be stubbed as they were on my Unix box without the right
> > linker options??
>
> With the "-Bsymbolic" flag(which I found only after you mentioned it)
> than none of
> these _SQL stubs are needed. Byron only added the _SQL stubs when I told
> him that
> there was a problem that I thought was related to an ODBC spec issue
> which was really
> just this problem all along. In other words my ignorance led me to a
> mistaken conclusion, which we have attempted to fix in the wrong way
> ever since. I really must apologize.
>
> So I'm positive its o.k. if you dust all references to _SQL functions.
>
This -Bsymbolic option is great news! Yes, indeed, go ahead and dust the
_SQL stubs in results.c!
Byron (minus one pair of tonsils)