Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas G. Lockhart
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status)
Дата
Msg-id 35D10188.B58E861B@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status)  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: type coersion (was OR clause status)
Список pgsql-hackers
> I just tried adding the extra line, and initdb failed.  I wonder if we
> remove the oideqint4, if the parser will go for oideq?

If you want to try this as an experiment, so we can tell if this is a
possible solution, then great. I still have hopes that we can substitute
other parse trees and strategies within the index utilization routines,
so how about not committing things until we've tried a few options.

match_clause_to_indexkey() seems to be a starting point for what I want
to do. Will let you know how it goes...

                       - Tom

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: partial index
Следующее
От: adm@pu.go.id
Дата:
Сообщение: HELP all women were raped during the May riots in Jakarta