Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes
| От | Vadim Mikheev |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 35C30622.4E86FA49@krs.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | OR with multi-key indexes (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Here is a comment in path/indxpath.c that says they don't want to use
> multi-key indexes with OR clauses. Of course, we now support multi-key
> indexes, and this code was disabled anyway because it was broken. (In
> fact, it was disabled by having SingleAttributeIndex() always return
> false.
>
> Is there any reason we can't use multi-key indexes if the first key
> matches our OR column? I don't see why not. Also, I don't know how to
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Me too.
> handle the case where we specify the first key of a multi-key index in
> an AND clause, and specify the second key in an OR clause because the
What do you mean? Example please...
> AND's are handled in a separate are of the code. Any ideas how to
> implement this? (Of course, the code would still use the index for the
> AND, but I don't know how to bring the AND case into my OR index clause
> processing area.)
Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: