Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes
От | Vadim Mikheev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 35C30622.4E86FA49@krs.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | OR with multi-key indexes (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] OR with multi-key indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Here is a comment in path/indxpath.c that says they don't want to use > multi-key indexes with OR clauses. Of course, we now support multi-key > indexes, and this code was disabled anyway because it was broken. (In > fact, it was disabled by having SingleAttributeIndex() always return > false. > > Is there any reason we can't use multi-key indexes if the first key > matches our OR column? I don't see why not. Also, I don't know how to ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Me too. > handle the case where we specify the first key of a multi-key index in > an AND clause, and specify the second key in an OR clause because the What do you mean? Example please... > AND's are handled in a separate are of the code. Any ideas how to > implement this? (Of course, the code would still use the index for the > AND, but I don't know how to bring the AND case into my OR index clause > processing area.) Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: