Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas G. Lockhart
Тема Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres
Дата
Msg-id 35A4D2DA.2D066E6C@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres  ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> I am curious though.   Did you apply the patch, mentioned below, to
> your latest 6.4 tree?    This patch should have been already part of
> the latest 6.4.   And, to my knowledge, it was already applied
> completely and successfully.

I did my final tests using a fresh cvs tree two days ago just before
committing my big "patch wad". In the last two or three weeks I did have
a "merge problem" with my patches in the resjunk area, which might have
been the patches you are talking about.

> Now that I think of it, though, this version of the patch does not
> include the new "output" and "sql"  files necessary for the regression
> test.   In any case, I should clean that up.

I am in the process of renaming and moving the "resjunk" test to
"select_implicit". Will try to commit the changes this morning so it is
available to you.

At the moment, all regression tests (except "random") pass on my Linux
box :)

                        - Tom

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Egon Schmid
Дата:
Сообщение: InitPostgres() fails through libpq
Следующее
От: Maarten Boekhold
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle