ohp@pyrenet.fr writes:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No. Why should the signal handler need re-arming?
> My impression was that once caught, signal handler for a particular signal
> is reset to SIG-DFL.
No. If your signal support is POSIX-compatible, it should not do that
because we don't set SA_RESETHAND when calling sigaction(2). If you
don't have POSIX signals, you had better have BSD-style signal(2),
which doesn't reset either. If this is not happening as expected,
you will have much worse problems than whether statement_timeout works :-(
regards, tom lane