Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers
Дата
Msg-id 3579.1045192235@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Список pgsql-performance
Дерево обсуждения 
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> Here's a question then - what is the _drawback_ to having 1024 wal_buffers
> as opposed to 8?

Waste of RAM?  You'd be better off leaving that 8 meg available for use
as general-purpose buffers ...

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers
Следующее
От: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] More benchmarking of wal_buffers