Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3577627.1674058487@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Improve GetConfigOptionValues function (Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function
Re: Improve GetConfigOptionValues function |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com> writes:
> GetConfigOptionValues function extracts the config parameters for the
> given variable irrespective of whether it results in noshow or not.
> But the parent function show_all_settings ignores the values parameter
> if it results in noshow. It's unnecessary to fetch all the values
> during noshow. So a return statement in GetConfigOptionValues() when
> noshow is set to true is needed. Attached the patch for the same.
> Please share your thoughts.
I do not think this is an improvement: it causes GetConfigOptionValues
to be making assumptions about how its results will be used. If
show_all_settings() were a big performance bottleneck, and there were
a lot of no-show values that we could optimize, then maybe the extra
coupling would be worthwhile. But I don't believe either of those
things.
Possibly a better answer is to refactor into separate functions,
along the lines of
static bool
ConfigOptionIsShowable(struct config_generic *conf)
static void
GetConfigOptionValues(struct config_generic *conf, const char **values)
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: