Re: Proposed patch for qual pushdown into UNION/INTERSECT
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed patch for qual pushdown into UNION/INTERSECT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3577.1030634699@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposed patch for qual pushdown into UNION/INTERSECT (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> writes: > I do wonder if queries like > select * from ((select * from bar1 union all select * from bar2 > union all (select * from bar1 except select * from bar2)) intersect select > * from bar1) as foo where a>4; > can push the a>4 restriction into the right side of the intersect which it > doesn't seem to right now, Not without a lot more work, which I haven't got time for now. > We could probably do: > Subquery > Intersect > Append > Subquery (passing down a>4) > Subquery (passing down a>4) > <something> (filter a>4) > Except > Subquery > Subquery > Subquery (passing down a>4) > and get the same effect, Yeah, the problem is the planner doesn't currently cope with attaching quals to intermediate levels of a set-op tree, so there's no way to do the above. > but I think > the mixed case is probably rare enough > to not worry about for now. Agreed. This is still a step forward. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: