Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I was wondering, should the patch be:
>
> if (j->jf_cleanTupType)
> tupType = j->jf_cleanTupType;
> rather than my current:
>
> if (operation == CMD_SELECT)
> tupType = j->jf_cleanTupType;
>
> Not sure.
>
The second option (your earlier suggestion) seems to be necessary and sufficient. The junk filter (and
jf_cleanTupType) will always exist, for SELECT statements, as long as the following is not a legal statement:
SELECT FROM foo GROUP BY bar;
Currently the parser will not accept it. Sufficient.
The first option will set tupType, for non-SELECT statements, to something it otherwise may not have been.
I would rather not risk effecting those calling routines which are not executing a SELECT command. At this
time, I do not understand them enough, and I see no benefit. Necessary?