Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?
Дата
Msg-id 3565659.1692827753@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2023-08-23 17:02:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... unless we hit problems with, say, a different default port number or
>> socket path compiled into one copy vs. the other?  That seems like it's
>> probably a "so don't do that" case, though.

> If we were to find such a case, it seems we could just add whatever missing
> parameter to the connection string? I think we would likely already hit such
> problems though, the psql started by an installcheck pg_regress might use the
> system libpq, I think?

The trouble with that approach is that in "make installcheck", we
don't really want to assume we know what the installed libpq's default
connection parameters are.  So we don't explicitly know where that
libpq will connect.

As I said, we might be able to start treating installed-libpq-not-
compatible-with-build as a "don't do it" case.  Another idea is to try
to ensure that pg_regress uses the same libpq that the psql-under-test
does; but I'm not sure how to implement that.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fix error handling in be_tls_open_server()
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?