Re: BUG #17220: ALTER INDEX ALTER COLUMN SET (..) with an optionless opclass makes index and table unusable

On 10/18/21, 12:47 AM, "Michael Paquier" <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> I have reviewed the last patch posted upthread, and while testing
> partitioned indexes I have noticed that we don't need to do a custom
> check as part of ATExecSetOptions(), because we have already that in
> ATSimplePermissions() with details on the relkind failing.  This makes
> the patch simpler, with a better error message generated.  I have
> added a case for partitioned indexes while on it.

Ah, yes, that is much better.

> Attached is the patch I am finishing with, that should go down to
> v13 (this is going to conflict on REL_13_STABLE, for sure).

+DROP INDEX btree_tall_tbl_idx2;
+ERROR:  index "btree_tall_tbl_idx2" does not exist

I think this is supposed to be "btree_tall_idx2".  Otherwise, the
patch looks reasonable to me.

Nathan