Re: Fix spinlock usage in UnpinBuffer()
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fix spinlock usage in UnpinBuffer() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3533.1135827106@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Fix spinlock usage in UnpinBuffer() ("Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Fix spinlock usage in UnpinBuffer()
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu> writes:
> I agree on this. But before changing it, we need to inspect those spinlocks
> one by one to making sure two things (1) if there is out-of-line-call, make
> sure no CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(); (2) ImmediateInterruptsOK is false (99% sure
> now).
I'm sure of those things already ... but feel free to look for yourself.
>> I think it would be better to substitute our own qsort only on those
>> platforms where we have specifically proved it's a win.
>>
> Our tests indicates that BSD version is better ... but it is just a
> home-brew test.
Better than what is the operative question.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: