Re: deadlock while re-indexing table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: deadlock while re-indexing table
Дата
Msg-id
3509.1202853947@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
deadlock while re-indexing table Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Re: deadlock while re-indexing table Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: deadlock while re-indexing table Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: deadlock while re-indexing table Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: deadlock while re-indexing table Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: deadlock while re-indexing table Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Re: deadlock while re-indexing table Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: deadlock while re-indexing table Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Re: deadlock while re-indexing table Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: deadlock while re-indexing table Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Re: deadlock while re-indexing table Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Dave Cramer  writes:
>>> The other process is inserting into the user_profile table.
>> 
>> Did either transaction do anything else in the same transaction  
>> previously?
>> 
> It would appear that the insert is running before the reindex starts.  

That's not possible --- if it had been, the insert would already have
RowExclusiveLock on the table, which would have blocked the reindex
from acquiring ShareLock on the table.  The reindex must already have
that, since it's trying to acquire AccessExclusiveLock on one of the
indexes, so there can't be any active inserts on the table.

I suspect the other process must be doing a series of selects in one
transaction that use indexes of the table in some random order, but
that's just an educated guess at this point.

BTW, what PG version is this?

			regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
FAQ