Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 13:03, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:59, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:
>> Just don't break anything in 9.0 that relies on plperl please. :) To that
>> end, let me know when HEAD has something somewhat stable, and I'll
>> run some tests against it (e.g. Bucardo, which uses lots of plperl)
>
> Defiantly, the goal is to not break anything :).

Err oops, as David Fetter pointed out... I *think* i meant to say definitely.