Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alex Hunsaker
Тема Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Дата
Msg-id 34d269d41002251129j743c55e6jb7f8e57d4079113d@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:20, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> writes:
>> 3) patch postgres to fix the recursive issue (What I'm leaning towards)
>> [ fixes both issues ]
>
> How exactly would you propose doing that?

Well that's the thing, probably by what I described below that. Namely
get something working for 9.1 and after we know its good and solid see
if we can back patch it.  Unfeasible?  If its really really simple and
straight forward maybe we can find a -commiter willing to commit it
sooner.  But I'm dubious.  I think the feeling between me and Tim is
patching postgres is a last resort...  Maybe if its to fix both sort
{} and this it might be worth it. (That's at least how I parsed what
you said :) ).  Ill see if I can figure something out via straight
Safe tonight.

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)
Следующее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)