Re: New PL/Perl failure with Safe 2.2x due to recursion (8.x & 9.0)

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 20:19, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>What you're saying, IIUC, is
> that if function A calls function B via a SPI command, and B wasn't
> executed previously in the current session, it would fail? =C2=A0Seems
> entirely unacceptable.

Yep, thats right :(.  Thanks, thats exactly the kind of feedback I
wanted to get.

I think we will see if we can get this fixed on the Safe/perl side then.

Tim, I think unless the Safe::Hole stuff is really straight forward it
seems like (as we previously agreed) the best change is to revert safe
to its old behavior for now.