Re: WG: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vadim B. Mikheev
Тема Re: WG: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field
Дата
Msg-id 34FF5EAA.A7792D0@sable.krasnoyarsk.su
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на WG: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field  (Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ <Andreas.Zeugswetter@telecom.at>)
Ответы Re: WG: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field  (Peter T Mount <psqlhack@maidast.demon.co.uk>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ wrote:
>
> > >> Allowing text to use blobs for values larger than the current block
> > size
> > >> would hit the same problem.
> > > When I told about multi-representation feature I ment that applications
> > > will not be affected by how text field is stored - in tuple or somewhere
> >
> > > else. Is this Ok for you ?
> >
> > This is also what I would have in mind. But I guess a change to the fe-be
> > protocol would still be necessary, since the client now allocates
> > a fixed amount of memory to receive one tuple, wasn't it ?
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't know, but imho it's not too hard to implement.

Vadim

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "D. Dante Lorenso"
Дата:
Сообщение: PostgreSQL and DBI/DBD...vs Pg.pm
Следующее
От: "Billy G. Allie"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Changes to sequence.c