Re: Proposal: Integrity check
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal: Integrity check |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3479.1201287276@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Integrity check (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Integrity check
Re: Proposal: Integrity check |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This seems like a pretty horrid idea. Bad pages shouldn't be allowed to
>> get into shared buffers in the first place. Why not have the checking
>> logic operate outside shared buffers?
> It currently works outside the shared buffers, but I afraid about
> collision due to parallel read and write access on one block. I'm not
> sure if parallel write(8k) and read(8k) is synchronized by kernel/fs or
> not. If not it should generates false positive results. If yes than I'm
> happy :-) with outside processing.
We're already assuming that; otherwise base backups for PITR don't work.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: