Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
Дата
Msg-id 3456.1156528776@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build  ("Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at> writes:
>> That was what the patch originally used, but it was changed 
>> because it made difficult for psql to auto-complete that.

> That is imho not enough of a reason to divert.

My recollection is that the principal argument against ONLINE was
that it didn't convey the function of the option to anyone who
didn't already know Oracle's usage of the term.

Also, psql's problem is not with auto-completion, it's with
detecting whether the command is allowed inside a transaction
block.  That's not a function we can just blow off.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gregory Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
Следующее
От: "Martin Atukunda"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case