Re: libpq debug log
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: libpq debug log | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3455705.1617299197@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: libpq debug log ("'alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org'" <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) | 
| Ответы | Re: libpq debug log Re: libpq debug log | 
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
"'alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org'" <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2021-Apr-01, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, what in the world is this supposed to accomplish?
>> -                        (long long) rows_to_send);
>> +                        (1L << 62) + (long long) rows_to_send);
> It makes the text representation wider, which means some buffer fills up
> faster and the program switches from sending to receiving.
Hm.  If the actual field value isn't relevant, why bother including
rows_to_send in it?  A constant string would be simpler and much
less confusing as to its purpose.
            regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: