Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c
Дата
Msg-id 3443537.1665190158@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2022-10-07 20:35:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>>> Why are we even tracking PM_CHILD_UNUSED / PM_CHILD_ASSIGNED in shared memory?

>> Because those flags are set by the child processes too, cf
>> MarkPostmasterChildActive and MarkPostmasterChildInactive.

> Only PM_CHILD_ACTIVE and PM_CHILD_WALSENDER though. We could afford another
> MaxLivePostmasterChildren() sized array...

Oh, I see what you mean --- one private and one public array.
Maybe that makes more sense than what I did, not sure.

>> I am, but I'm not inclined to push this immediately before a wrap.

> +1

OK, I'll take a little more time on this and maybe code it up as
you suggest.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Non-robustness in pmsignal.c
Следующее
От: Ranier Vilela
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Avoid mix char with bool type in comparisons