Re: LLVM breakage on seawasp

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On August 24, 2019 1:57:56 PM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> So we're depending on APIs that upstream doesn't think are stable?

>  Seawasp iirc builds against the development branch of llvm, which explains why we see failures there. Does that
addresswhat you are concerned about? If not, could you expand? 

I know it's the development branch.  The question is whether this
breakage is something *they* ought to be fixing.  If not, I'm
worried that we're too much in bed with implementation details
of LLVM that we shouldn't be depending on.

            regards, tom lane