Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3422.1386221422@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Performance optimization of btree binary search
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 20:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Lazy people? I'm not in a hurry to drop it; it's not costing us much to
>> just sit there, other than in this connection which we see how to fix.
> Actually, I think it probably costs a fair portion of extension authors
> when their initial code crashes because they forgot to declare all their
> functions V1. I think it might actually be more of a bother to lazy
> people than a benefit.
Hm. We have heard one or two complaints like that, but not a huge number.
I'm worried about breaking code that's been working since god-knows-when;
but I will concede there's little evidence that there's very much of that
out there either.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: