Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Дата
Msg-id 3411577.1617289776@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.  (Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
Список pgsql-hackers
Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> writes:
> Pushed.

The buildfarm points out that this fails under valgrind.
I easily reproduced it here:

==00:00:03:42.115 3410499== Syscall param epoll_wait(events) points to unaddressable byte(s)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    at 0x58E926B: epoll_wait (epoll_wait.c:30)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x7FC903: WaitEventSetWaitBlock (latch.c:1452)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x7FC903: WaitEventSetWait (latch.c:1398)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6BF46C: ExecAppendAsyncEventWait (nodeAppend.c:1025)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6BF667: ExecAppendAsyncGetNext (nodeAppend.c:915)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6BF667: ExecAppend (nodeAppend.c:337)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6D49E4: ExecProcNode (executor.h:257)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6D49E4: ExecModifyTable (nodeModifyTable.c:2222)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6A87F2: ExecProcNode (executor.h:257)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6A87F2: ExecutePlan (execMain.c:1531)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6A87F2: standard_ExecutorRun (execMain.c:350)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x82597F: ProcessQuery (pquery.c:160)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x825BE9: PortalRunMulti (pquery.c:1267)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x826826: PortalRun (pquery.c:779)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x82291E: exec_simple_query (postgres.c:1185)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x823F3E: PostgresMain (postgres.c:4415)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x79BAC1: BackendRun (postmaster.c:4483)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x79BAC1: BackendStartup (postmaster.c:4205)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x79BAC1: ServerLoop (postmaster.c:1737)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==  Address 0x10d10628 is 7,960 bytes inside a recently re-allocated block of size 8,192
alloc'd
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    at 0x4C30F0B: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x94F9EA: AllocSetAlloc (aset.c:919)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x957BAF: MemoryContextAlloc (mcxt.c:809)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x958CC0: MemoryContextStrdup (mcxt.c:1179)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x516AE4: untransformRelOptions (reloptions.c:1336)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6E6ADF: GetForeignTable (foreign.c:273)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0xF3BD470: postgresBeginForeignScan (postgres_fdw.c:1479)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6C2E83: ExecInitForeignScan (nodeForeignscan.c:236)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6AF893: ExecInitNode (execProcnode.c:283)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6C0007: ExecInitAppend (nodeAppend.c:232)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6AFA37: ExecInitNode (execProcnode.c:180)
==00:00:03:42.115 3410499==    by 0x6D533A: ExecInitModifyTable (nodeModifyTable.c:2575)

==00:00:03:44.907 3410499== Syscall param epoll_wait(events) points to unaddressable byte(s)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    at 0x58E926B: epoll_wait (epoll_wait.c:30)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x7FC903: WaitEventSetWaitBlock (latch.c:1452)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x7FC903: WaitEventSetWait (latch.c:1398)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x6BF46C: ExecAppendAsyncEventWait (nodeAppend.c:1025)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x6BF718: ExecAppend (nodeAppend.c:370)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x6D49E4: ExecProcNode (executor.h:257)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x6D49E4: ExecModifyTable (nodeModifyTable.c:2222)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x6A87F2: ExecProcNode (executor.h:257)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x6A87F2: ExecutePlan (execMain.c:1531)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x6A87F2: standard_ExecutorRun (execMain.c:350)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x82597F: ProcessQuery (pquery.c:160)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x825BE9: PortalRunMulti (pquery.c:1267)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x826826: PortalRun (pquery.c:779)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x82291E: exec_simple_query (postgres.c:1185)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x823F3E: PostgresMain (postgres.c:4415)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x79BAC1: BackendRun (postmaster.c:4483)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x79BAC1: BackendStartup (postmaster.c:4205)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x79BAC1: ServerLoop (postmaster.c:1737)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==  Address 0x1093fdd8 is 2,904 bytes inside a recently re-allocated block of size 16,384
alloc'd
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    at 0x4C30F0B: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:307)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x94F9EA: AllocSetAlloc (aset.c:919)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x958233: palloc (mcxt.c:964)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x69C400: ExprEvalPushStep (execExpr.c:2310)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x69C541: ExecPushExprSlots (execExpr.c:2490)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x69C580: ExecInitExprSlots (execExpr.c:2445)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x69F0DD: ExecInitQual (execExpr.c:231)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x6D80EF: ExecInitSeqScan (nodeSeqscan.c:172)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x6AF9CE: ExecInitNode (execProcnode.c:208)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x6C0007: ExecInitAppend (nodeAppend.c:232)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x6AFA37: ExecInitNode (execProcnode.c:180)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==    by 0x6D533A: ExecInitModifyTable (nodeModifyTable.c:2575)
==00:00:03:44.907 3410499==

Sorta looks like something is relying on a pointer into the relcache
to be valid for longer than it can safely rely on that.  The
CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS animals will probably be unhappy too, but
they are slower than valgrind.

(Note that the test case appears to succeed, you have to notice that
the backend crashed after exiting.)

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_amcheck contrib application
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit