Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alex Turner
Тема Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)
Дата
Msg-id 33c6269f0609182040m28ac1e0ei34f617957ac3227a@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
Ответы Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Sweet - thats good - RAID 10 support seems like an odd thing to leave out.

Alex

On 9/18/06, Luke Lonergan < llonergan@greenplum.com> wrote:
Alex,

On 9/18/06 4:14 PM, "Alex Turner" < armtuk@gmail.com> wrote:

> Be warned, the tech specs page:
> http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4500/specs.xml#anchor3
> doesn't mention RAID 10 as a possible, and this is probably what most would
> recommend for fast data access if you are doing both read and write
> operations.  If you are doing mostly Read, then RAID 5 is passable, but it's
> redundancy with large numbers of drives is not so great.

RAID10 works great on the X4500 ­ we get 1.6GB/s + per X4500 using RAID10 in
ZFS.  We worked with the Sun Solaris kernel team to make that happen and the
patches are part of Solaris 10 Update 3 due out in November.

- Luke



В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Marc McIntyre
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LIKE query problem
Следующее
От: "Luke Lonergan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as